Comments on: Scientific writing for young investigators

By: Geowhy 2009-11月报 » 亚克蜥

Geowhy 2009-11月报 » 亚克蜥 — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:46:37 +0000

[...] hedgehog是个非常有创新能力的好青年，用twitter来做地理研究让我很兴奋地看到了SNS的又一功能。彩虹博士带着一颗粉肌肉男的内心写下关于《高级生物学英文论文写作》的博文看得我一愣一愣的。强烈建议他们在变成Desperate Labwolf前多多发博～ [...]

By: Beardnan

Beardnan — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:23:49 +0000

update：不过有一条的确是很有用的，就是，一气呵成的往下写，写完了最后再回头修改，不管觉得刚刚写的句子和内容有多么的狗屎。

后来觉得这条特管用，修改总比一清二白的写，要简单多了。

By: Beardnan

Beardnan — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:19:08 +0000

香港的吧。
这人怎么到处讲这个事儿啊，
好几年前就受教于斯，
当时也是哈醍醐灌顶，倍感亲切啊，
后来还不是执行不下去，
国情差太多了。

By: Rainbowrain

Rainbowrain — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:16:17 +0000

keep it simple and smart~

By: hedgehog

hedgehog — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:02:29 +0000

那换成able to或者enable，entail？

By: Rainbowrain

Rainbowrain — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:47:31 +0000

could/can 参见12
These words fit speculative discussion, where uncertainty does exist.在英语语境下，并不单是表“能”。

少用there be大概是为了让文字更精练吧，主谓宾，嗒嗒嗒，最清晰明确。这一点，我觉得也有他personal bias的可能性吧。

By: hedgehog

hedgehog — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:16:40 +0000

我想问 could can 和 there is/are 为啥要少用

By: georgexsh

georgexsh — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:30:49 +0000

其实tsing说得是kiss

By: Rainbowrain

Rainbowrain — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:29:50 +0000

你竟然看了这篇~
赞学术IT民工
你的高度总结相当好

By: tsing

tsing — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:49:44 +0000

“You should use most simple English to give information as clear as possible. It’s not about using fancy words and structures to impress the editor or reviewer, but to make it easily understandable. The less time they spend on the tricky expressions, the easier it could be published.”

这个可以用it民工的keep it simple, stupid来概括吗